Difference between revisions of "Systems thinking"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Zeroth version.) |
(+= http://www.infoq.com/articles/agile-aus2014-dalton) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
According to {{author|Jamshid Gharajedaghi}}, author of {{book|Systems Thinking, Managing Chaos and Complexity}}: | According to {{author|Jamshid Gharajedaghi}}, author of {{book|Systems Thinking, Managing Chaos and Complexity}}: | ||
{{quote|There are fundamental differences between the nature of the bond in mechanical systems and the nature of the bonds in sociocultural systems … while the elements of a mechanical system are 'energy bonded', those of sociocultural systems are 'information bonded.|Jamshid Gharajedaghi}} | {{quote|There are fundamental differences between the nature of the bond in mechanical systems and the nature of the bonds in sociocultural systems … while the elements of a mechanical system are 'energy bonded', those of sociocultural systems are 'information bonded.|Jamshid Gharajedaghi}} | ||
==Sources== | |||
*http://www.infoq.com/articles/agile-aus2014-dalton | |||
Revision as of 09:54, 31 August 2014
Self-organizing systems are information-bonded, meaning that information is the glue that holds them together. intent at least two levels up is a powerful way to influence what is going on inside groups. According to Jamshid Gharajedaghi, author of Systems Thinking, Managing Chaos and Complexity:
- There are fundamental differences between the nature of the bond in mechanical systems and the nature of the bonds in sociocultural systems … while the elements of a mechanical system are 'energy bonded', those of sociocultural systems are 'information bonded.