Difference between revisions of "Estimate"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(+= Thou shalt not treat estimates as commitments.) |
(+= Setting deadlines and promises based on estimates is dysfunctional.) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Thou shalt not treat estimates as commitments. | Thou shalt not treat estimates as commitments. | ||
Setting deadlines and promises based on estimates is dysfunctional. | |||
*→ {{p|metrics drive behavior}} | *→ {{p|metrics drive behavior}} |
Revision as of 16:40, 8 September 2014
- In preparing for [projects] I have always found that [estimates] are useless, but [estimating] is indispensable.
- It’s better to be roughly right than precisely wrong
We keep on estimating and planning according to those estimates, expecting to meet deadlines and firing the wise fools that question the practice, and report the actual numbers that are not accepted by management. However…
- Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
Watch out for:
- Estimates become targets.
Use yesterday’s weather, which implies “results from the past give guarantees for the future”.
Collect metrics about the real system, like average lead time distribution, cumulative flow diagram, average throughput, and predictability.
Thou shalt not treat estimates as commitments.
Setting deadlines and promises based on estimates is dysfunctional.
- → metrics drive behavior
- → relative estimation
- http://www.djaa.com/noestimates-beef-and-agiles-trojan-horse
- #noestimates
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probabilistic_method
- http://www.infoq.com/articles/software-development-effort-estimation
- http://softwaredevelopmenttoday.blogspot.co.nz/2012/01/story-points-considered-harmful-or-why.html
- http://www.infoq.com/resource/minibooks/emag-agile-estimation/en/pdf/Agile-Project-Estimation-and-Planning-eMag.pdf
See plastic plan.