Difference between revisions of "Tactical product owner"

From Pearl Language
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Zeroth version.)
 
(Business Analyst → Agile Business Analyst → Tactical Product Owner)
Line 16: Line 16:
*Collect and process customer & user product feedback
*Collect and process customer & user product feedback
*Optimize feature set within set pricing constraints
*Optimize feature set within set pricing constraints
Current [[business analyst]]s can evolve into {{p|agile business analyst}}s and become excellent candidates for {{p|tactical product owner}}s.
|therefore=Split the single {{p|product owner}} into a {{p|strategic product owner}} and {{p|tactical product owner}}. For successful {{p|collaborative product discovery}} distinguish between but do not separate these mutually reinforcing roles.
|therefore=Split the single {{p|product owner}} into a {{p|strategic product owner}} and {{p|tactical product owner}}. For successful {{p|collaborative product discovery}} distinguish between but do not separate these mutually reinforcing roles.
}}
}}

Revision as of 17:04, 19 September 2012

collaborative product discovery of a large product or product portfolio in a complex and layered organization.

✣  ✣  ✣

{{{wish full}}}

Arlen Bankston explains: tactical product owners focus on productive product creation:

  • One per team
  • Write or lead development of detailed User Stories
  • Lead analysis and refinement activities to get user stories ready to build
  • Make development team- and sprint-level prioritization decisions
  • Focus on product backlog and sprint planning meeting (for scrum teams)
  • Realize the product, including operational rollout and documentation
  • Address market opportunities
  • Collect and process customer & user product feedback
  • Optimize feature set within set pricing constraints

Current business analysts can evolve into agile business analysts and become excellent candidates for tactical product owners.

Therefore:

{{{therefore full}}}

✣  ✣  ✣



✣  ✣  ✣

[[wish::The work is simply too much for a single product owner. Finding or training a good product owner is hard and expensive.|]]