Difference between revisions of "Operations review"

From Pearl Language
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Notes++)
(Refer to {{p|metrics drive behavior}})
Line 1: Line 1:
Operations Review:
Since {{p|metrics drive behavior}}, an {{p|operations review}}:
*reminds everyone that we are running a business;
*reminds everyone that we are running a business;
*presents a summary of the overall performance for the month;
*presents a summary of the overall performance for the month;
**budget details;
**budget details;
**throughput;
**throughput;
**headcount;
**headcount;
**tells how well we are managing against budget, and, therefore, how much slack we have to do kaizen, buy items like flat-screen monitors and new computers.
**tells how well we are managing against budget, and, therefore, how much slack we have to do {{japanese|kaizen}}, buy items like flat-screen monitors and new computers or throw a party.
*takes place on second Friday of the subsequent month so that the financial data after the books for the prior month are closed;
*builds on the financial data of the previous time period, so takes place after the books for the prior month are closed
*preferably takes place on a fixed day of the week, for example on the second Friday of the subsequent month;
*compares planned versus actual numbers;
*compares planned versus actual numbers;
*is the feedback loop between adjacent layers in the holarchy:
*is the feedback loop between adjacent layers in the holarchy:
**the Check in the PDCA-cycle;
**the Check in the PDCA-cycle;
*the Measure in Sociocracy;
**the Measure in Sociocracy;
*Sprint Review Meeting in Scrum;
**{{p|sprint}} or release {{p|review meeting}} in {{p|scrum}}.
*Release Review Meeting in Scrum.


A mini Operations Review:
A mini {{p|operations review}}:
*is an objective, data-driven retrospective on the {{p|squad}}'s or organization’s performance rather than the more subjective, anecdotal, qualitative management.
*is an objective, data-driven retrospective on the {{p|squad}}'s or organization’s performance rather than the more subjective, anecdotal, qualitative management.
*is above and beyond any one {{p|sprint}} or project;
*is above and beyond any one {{p|sprint}} or project;

Revision as of 11:02, 3 April 2013

Since metrics drive behavior, an operations review:

  • reminds everyone that we are running a business;
  • presents a summary of the overall performance for the month;
    • budget details;
    • throughput;
    • headcount;
    • tells how well we are managing against budget, and, therefore, how much slack we have to do kaizen, buy items like flat-screen monitors and new computers or throw a party.
  • builds on the financial data of the previous time period, so takes place after the books for the prior month are closed
  • preferably takes place on a fixed day of the week, for example on the second Friday of the subsequent month;
  • compares planned versus actual numbers;
  • is the feedback loop between adjacent layers in the holarchy:

A mini operations review:

  • is an objective, data-driven retrospective on the squad's or organization’s performance rather than the more subjective, anecdotal, qualitative management.
  • is above and beyond any one sprint or project;
  • sets an expectation;
  • provides the feedback loop that enables growth of organizational maturity and organization- level continuous improvement.
  • reviews data like:
    • defect rates
    • average lead time distribution
    • throughput
    • value-added efficiency, and, occasionally,
    • a specific report that would drill into some aspect of our process on which the business needs more information
  • wraps up with questions & answers, comments, and suggestions from the floor for a few minutes.

To keep our costs under control, guest sponsors food—Invite a vice president from another part of the company so that our value-stream partners take an interest, show interest in them and invite them to present.

Source:

  • Kanban—Successful Evolutionary Change for Your Technology Business, David Anderson