Difference between revisions of "Consent"
(Zeroth version.) |
(Background++) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Oyster | {{Oyster | ||
|stage=Sparkle | |stage=Sparkle | ||
|theme=Agile | |||
|context=tough situations with a need for difficult or complex decision making. | |context=tough situations with a need for difficult or complex decision making. | ||
|wish in a single line=You want the best solution to emerge while making progress. | |wish in a single line=You want the best itegrative solution to emerge while making progress. | ||
|therefore in a single line=Adopt the right for everyone to object proposals, based on solid arguments. Have a leader make a final decision to keep up to speed. | |therefore in a single line=Adopt the right for everyone to object proposals, based on solid arguments. Have a leader available make a final decision to keep up to speed. | ||
|wish=You want the best solution to emerge while making progress. | |wish=You want the best solution to emerge while making progress. | ||
|background=Consent is about integrative decision-making so that, for the time being, all decisions will be within the limits of tolerance of all aspects of the system. | |||
Policies and decisions are crafted by systematically, integrating the core truth or value in each perspective put forth. The measurement of when you have achieved consent is that no one involved in the decision-making process knows of a reasoned and paramount objection to proceeding with the proposed decision. All reasoned and paramount objections must be addressed in the decision-making process, giving everyone involved in the process a voice in their own governance. | |||
The '''thumbs protocol''' is a light-weight version of consent—a proposal is accepted if there is at least one thumb up and no thumb down. Thumb down means that someone has a reasoned and paramount objection to the proposal. | |||
Do not confuse consent with consensus. They are fundamentally different. | |||
|therefore=Adopt the right for everyone to object proposals, based on solid arguments. Have a leader make a final decision to keep up to speed. | |therefore=Adopt the right for everyone to object proposals, based on solid arguments. Have a leader make a final decision to keep up to speed. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 08:46, 15 January 2013
…tough situations with a need for difficult or complex decision making.
✣ ✣ ✣
{{{wish full}}}
Consent is about integrative decision-making so that, for the time being, all decisions will be within the limits of tolerance of all aspects of the system.
Policies and decisions are crafted by systematically, integrating the core truth or value in each perspective put forth. The measurement of when you have achieved consent is that no one involved in the decision-making process knows of a reasoned and paramount objection to proceeding with the proposed decision. All reasoned and paramount objections must be addressed in the decision-making process, giving everyone involved in the process a voice in their own governance.
The thumbs protocol is a light-weight version of consent—a proposal is accepted if there is at least one thumb up and no thumb down. Thumb down means that someone has a reasoned and paramount objection to the proposal.
Do not confuse consent with consensus. They are fundamentally different.
Therefore:
{{{therefore full}}}
✣ ✣ ✣
✣ ✣ ✣