Difference between revisions of "Ambiguity test"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Tim -> Tom) |
(The beginning of wisdom is the definition of terms—Plato) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|wish in a single line=You want clear, unambiguous and intelligeble requirements, expressing needs and wishes. | |wish in a single line=You want clear, unambiguous and intelligeble requirements, expressing needs and wishes. | ||
|therefore in a single line=Count the number of words that are potentially ambiguous, and collect and compare interpretations. | |therefore in a single line=Count the number of words that are potentially ambiguous, and collect and compare interpretations. | ||
|prologue=The beginning of wisdom is the definition of terms—Plato | |||
|wish=You want clear, unambiguous and intelligeble requirements, expressing needs and wishes. | |wish=You want clear, unambiguous and intelligeble requirements, expressing needs and wishes. | ||
|background=Tom and Kai Gilb talk about ''User Stories: A Skeptical View''. | |background=Tom and Kai Gilb talk about ''User Stories: A Skeptical View''. | ||
Revision as of 10:17, 8 November 2012
- The beginning of wisdom is the definition of terms—Plato
…preparing product backlog items and other forms of requirements and specifications.
✣ ✣ ✣
{{{wish full}}}
Tom and Kai Gilb talk about User Stories: A Skeptical View.
The 'requirement':
- "We want the most intuitive system possible."
- How many words are potentially ambiguous? All.
Collect interpretations, and you will find everybody has quite different interpretations, none are identical.
An alternative to prove unintelligibility is counting defects in relation to the
Therefore:
{{{therefore full}}}
✣ ✣ ✣
✣ ✣ ✣