Difference between revisions of "Ready to build"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(QIQO) |
(Added Other useful practices for testable.) |
||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
Popular tools like Cucumber can be used to express these criteria and facilitate automated testing practices. | Popular tools like Cucumber can be used to express these criteria and facilitate automated testing practices. | ||
Other useful practices include giving examples of: | |||
*use case processes; | |||
*reports; | |||
*queries; | |||
*input forms; and | |||
*inspectors. | |||
|- | |- | ||
|valign="top"|'''demonstrable''' | |valign="top"|'''demonstrable''' |
Revision as of 13:17, 27 October 2011
…scrum, about to pull in product backlog items into the sprint.
✣ ✣ ✣
{{{wish full}}}
- Downstream Definition of Ready equals the upstream Definition of Done.
- Definition of Ready means that any item pulled into the sprint.
- High quality definition of ready leads to high-quality work and speeds up velocity.
See below for a detailed explanation.
Therefore:
{{{therefore full}}}
✣ ✣ ✣
✣ ✣ ✣
Table below is based on Bill Wake's INVEST acronym.
Second column is the test designed to proof the validity of the first.
Check | Proof |
---|---|
immediately actionable | The development teams have no no known questions regarding the what, why and for whom of the item and can immediately start implementing the item, working on it until it is done, completing it until it meets all criteria that allow it to be pulled into the next station.
To improve actionability, consider providing:
|
independent | The dependency count is less than three, meaning that the item is relatively independent and does not pull a lot of other items into the sprint. |
understanding | The development team explains the context, what, why (value creation) and for whom (persona) back to the product owner. |
negotiable | The item is clear on the what, yet still leaves room for:
|
valuable | The relative (business) value is clear and written on the item. |
estimatable | The item's relative implementation effort expressed in story points is written on the item by the development team, using techniques like planning poker. |
sized appropriately | The item's estimated implementation effort is 8 story points or less. |
testable | Crystal clear acceptance criteria for both the product owner and operations are associated with the item, probably written on the back of the item or documented in an automated test harness.
Acceptance criteria help to:
Popular tools like Cucumber can be used to express these criteria and facilitate automated testing practices. Other useful practices include giving examples of:
|
demonstrable | Either the development team or product owner or both can demonstrate the item when implemented.
Defining and scripting the demonstration helps to:
|