Difference between revisions of "Allies experience differences"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (terse/full) |
m (’) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|stage=Sparkle | |stage=Sparkle | ||
|context=dialogue, conversation, discussion, debate on {{p|questions that matter}}. You are doing your best to apply {{p|don’t just do something, stand there!}}. | |context=dialogue, conversation, discussion, debate on {{p|questions that matter}}. You are doing your best to apply {{p|don’t just do something, stand there!}}. | ||
|wish in a single line=Constructive, progressing, energizing gatherings. Meetings that matter. | |||
|so=Identify differences, make them heard, involve everyone, create subgroups exploring and integrating the differences. | |||
|wish=Constructive, progressing, energizing gatherings. Meetings that matter. | |wish=Constructive, progressing, energizing gatherings. Meetings that matter. | ||
|background=Forces: | |background=Forces: | ||
*when people make controversial statements, they risk being ignored, coerced, or attacked, causing them to abandon the conversation and task; | *when people make controversial statements, they risk being ignored, coerced, or attacked, causing them to abandon the conversation and task; | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
*point out if a the flow of conversations flows away for several comments in a row—“Let’s pause and see were we are. I think I’m losing the thread.” | *point out if a the flow of conversations flows away for several comments in a row—“Let’s pause and see were we are. I think I’m losing the thread.” | ||
*find anyone who has wandered far alone and is at risk of not coming back, and ask, “I know there is a connection between what you are saying and the topic we are discussing. How does it connect up for you?” | *find anyone who has wandered far alone and is at risk of not coming back, and ask, “I know there is a connection between what you are saying and the topic we are discussing. How does it connect up for you?” | ||
|therefore=Identify differences, make them heard, involve everyone, create subgroups exploring and integrating the differences. | |||
|wish full=Constructive, progressing, energizing gatherings. Meetings that matter. | |||
|therefore full=Identify differences, make them heard, involve everyone, create subgroups exploring and integrating the differences. | |therefore full=Identify differences, make them heard, involve everyone, create subgroups exploring and integrating the differences. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 38: | Line 40: | ||
#Run a {{p|clarifying go-around}} to find out what to do next. | #Run a {{p|clarifying go-around}} to find out what to do next. | ||
{{Source | {{Source | ||
|source= | |source=Don’t Just Do Something, Stand There! | ||
|author=Marvin Weisbord, Sandra Janoff | |author=Marvin Weisbord, Sandra Janoff | ||
|coder={{mvs}} | |coder={{mvs}} | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 09:05, 26 May 2013
…dialogue, conversation, discussion, debate on questions that matter. You are doing your best to apply don’t just do something, stand there!.
✣ ✣ ✣
Constructive, progressing, energizing gatherings. Meetings that matter.
Forces:
- when people make controversial statements, they risk being ignored, coerced, or attacked, causing them to abandon the conversation and task;
- making sure that no obody becomes a scapegoat for saying something out of the ordinary keeps groups whole and working on their task (witness the TED psi wars about Sheldrake)
- diagnosing a group's behavior is futile;
- only become active in those instances where disagreements might end productive work;
- experience differences as a creative opportunity to keep people working without their having to agree instead of dreading conflict;
- it is our lot to categorize people before we know them;
- subgrouping goes on all the time in the meeting; knowing this phenomenon gives you the leadership options you never had before;
- with a few well-chosen words, you can change a stereotypical subgroup into its functional—contributing to growth—equivalent;
- as long as each person has an ally, people maintain their independence;
- as long as there is a subgroup for every viewpoint, every voice is hear, and people add new information, the whole group is more likely to keep working on their task;
- getting people to differentiate themselves—to heighten their awareness of their differences—holds the key to integrated problem solving and decision making;
- every contribution has value, even though it might not be obvious;
- groups and individuals usually ignore a person's stumbling;
Therefore:
- help people experience functional differences when stereotypes might prevail—group members will take care of the rest;
- Just Stand There as long as people stay with the task by:
- putting out their own ideas;
- asking questions;
- answering questions;
- asking for or giving information;
- building on each other's ideas;
- point out if a the flow of conversations flows away for several comments in a row—“Let’s pause and see were we are. I think I’m losing the thread.”
- find anyone who has wandered far alone and is at risk of not coming back, and ask, “I know there is a connection between what you are saying and the topic we are discussing. How does it connect up for you?”
Therefore:
Identify differences, make them heard, involve everyone, create subgroups exploring and integrating the differences.
✣ ✣ ✣
✣ ✣ ✣
Key techniques
- Ask an ”anyone else?” question to acknowledge real feelings and keep everyone included and focused on the task at hand.
- Explore the field of views uncover a more grounded sense of what everyone considers relevant.
- Be alert for integrating statement leaps forward to move from either/or to both/and.
- Run a clarifying go-around to find out what to do next.