Difference between revisions of "Stable team"

From Pearl Language
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Typo.)
(Background++)
Line 13: Line 13:
*{{p|t-shaped}}—both the team and its members;
*{{p|t-shaped}}—both the team and its members;
*resilient, i.e. having a {{p|moderate truck number}}.
*resilient, i.e. having a {{p|moderate truck number}}.
Productivity differences of {{p|stable team}}s are huge and increase:
*quality of work;
*satisfaction;
*joy in work stuff;
*customer delight;
* customer satisfaction
Customer delight drives profitability and gives reason for existence.
|therefore=Evolve stable, resilient, co-located, and multi-disciplinary {{p|development team}}s. Don't let anyone touch it. In {{p|scrum}}, the {{p|product owner}} and {{p|scrum master}} will aggressively push back on anything that can potentially disrupt the team dynamic and high communication bandwidth in hyperproductive teams.
|therefore=Evolve stable, resilient, co-located, and multi-disciplinary {{p|development team}}s. Don't let anyone touch it. In {{p|scrum}}, the {{p|product owner}} and {{p|scrum master}} will aggressively push back on anything that can potentially disrupt the team dynamic and high communication bandwidth in hyperproductive teams.
|new=Make every {{p|development team}} and {{p|community of practice}} create and evolve a {{p|team charter}}.
|new=Make every {{p|development team}} and {{p|community of practice}} create and evolve a {{p|team charter}}.

Revision as of 12:53, 15 January 2013

collaborative product discovery with multiple development teams.

✣  ✣  ✣

{{{wish full}}}

Any product owner wants sharp and focused development teams that are:

Productivity differences of stable teams are huge and increase:

  • quality of work;
  • satisfaction;
  • joy in work stuff;
  • customer delight;
  • customer satisfaction

Customer delight drives profitability and gives reason for existence.

Therefore:

{{{therefore full}}}

✣  ✣  ✣

Make every development team and community of practice create and evolve a team charter.


✣  ✣  ✣

Source

  • XP?
  • Organizational Pattern Language?