Difference between revisions of "Allies experience differences"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Goal.) |
(Amended.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Oyster | {{Oyster | ||
|goal= | |goal=set up conditions under which every person can be independent of group pressure | ||
|stage=Sparkle | |stage=Sparkle | ||
|context=dialogue, conversation, discussion, debate on {{p|questions that matter}}. You are doing your best to apply {{p|don’t just do something, stand there!}}. | |context=dialogue, conversation, discussion, debate on {{p|questions that matter}}. You are doing your best to apply {{p|don’t just do something, stand there!}}. | ||
|wish= | |wish=Set up conditions under which every person can be independent of group pressure help identify and integrate differences into a bigger whole. | ||
|so=Identify differences, make them heard, involve everyone, create subgroups exploring and integrating the differences. | |so=Identify differences, make them heard, involve everyone, create subgroups exploring and integrating the differences. | ||
|wish full= | |wish full=Setting up conditions under which every person can be independent of group pressure help identify and integrate differences into a bigger whole, leading to constructive, progressing, energizing gatherings. Meetings that matter. | ||
|background=Forces: | |background=Forces: | ||
*when people make controversial statements, they risk being ignored, coerced, or attacked, causing them to abandon the conversation and task; | *when people make controversial statements, they risk being ignored, coerced, or attacked, causing them to abandon the conversation and task; | ||
*making sure that | *making sure that nobody becomes a scapegoat for saying something out of the ordinary keeps groups whole and working on their task (witness the TED psi wars about Sheldrake) | ||
*diagnosing a group's behavior is futile; | *diagnosing a group's behavior is futile; | ||
*only become active in those instances where disagreements might end productive work; | *only become active in those instances where disagreements might end productive work; | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
*point out if a the flow of conversations flows away for several comments in a row—“Let’s pause and see were we are. I think I’m losing the thread.” | *point out if a the flow of conversations flows away for several comments in a row—“Let’s pause and see were we are. I think I’m losing the thread.” | ||
*find anyone who has wandered far alone and is at risk of not coming back, and ask, “I know there is a connection between what you are saying and the topic we are discussing. How does it connect up for you?” | *find anyone who has wandered far alone and is at risk of not coming back, and ask, “I know there is a connection between what you are saying and the topic we are discussing. How does it connect up for you?” | ||
|therefore full=Identify differences, make them heard, involve everyone, create subgroups exploring and integrating the differences. | |therefore full=Identify differences, make them heard, acknowledge them, and involve everyone, create subgroups exploring and integrating the differences. | ||
|wish in a single line=Constructive, progressing, energizing gatherings. Meetings that matter. | |wish in a single line=Constructive, progressing, energizing gatherings. Meetings that matter. | ||
|therefore=Identify differences, make them heard, involve everyone, create subgroups exploring and integrating the differences. | |therefore=Identify differences, make them heard, involve everyone, create subgroups exploring and integrating the differences. |
Revision as of 12:09, 22 March 2014
…dialogue, conversation, discussion, debate on questions that matter. You are doing your best to apply don’t just do something, stand there!.
✣ ✣ ✣
Setting up conditions under which every person can be independent of group pressure help identify and integrate differences into a bigger whole, leading to constructive, progressing, energizing gatherings. Meetings that matter.
Forces:
- when people make controversial statements, they risk being ignored, coerced, or attacked, causing them to abandon the conversation and task;
- making sure that nobody becomes a scapegoat for saying something out of the ordinary keeps groups whole and working on their task (witness the TED psi wars about Sheldrake)
- diagnosing a group's behavior is futile;
- only become active in those instances where disagreements might end productive work;
- experience differences as a creative opportunity to keep people working without their having to agree instead of dreading conflict;
- it is our lot to categorize people before we know them;
- subgrouping goes on all the time in the meeting; knowing this phenomenon gives you the leadership options you never had before;
- with a few well-chosen words, you can change a stereotypical subgroup into its functional—contributing to growth—equivalent;
- as long as each person has an ally, people maintain their independence;
- as long as there is a subgroup for every viewpoint, every voice is hear, and people add new information, the whole group is more likely to keep working on their task;
- getting people to differentiate themselves—to heighten their awareness of their differences—holds the key to integrated problem solving and decision making;
- every contribution has value, even though it might not be obvious;
- groups and individuals usually ignore a person's stumbling;
Therefore:
- help people experience functional differences when stereotypes might prevail—group members will take care of the rest;
- Just Stand There as long as people stay with the task by:
- putting out their own ideas;
- asking questions;
- answering questions;
- asking for or giving information;
- building on each other's ideas;
- point out if a the flow of conversations flows away for several comments in a row—“Let’s pause and see were we are. I think I’m losing the thread.”
- find anyone who has wandered far alone and is at risk of not coming back, and ask, “I know there is a connection between what you are saying and the topic we are discussing. How does it connect up for you?”
Therefore:
Identify differences, make them heard, acknowledge them, and involve everyone, create subgroups exploring and integrating the differences.
✣ ✣ ✣
✣ ✣ ✣
Key techniques
- Ask an ”anyone else?” question to acknowledge real feelings and keep everyone included and focused on the task at hand.
- Explore the field of views uncover a more grounded sense of what everyone considers relevant.
- Be alert for integrating statement leaps forward to move from either/or to both/and.
- Run a clarifying go-around to find out what to do next.