Difference between revisions of "Product review meeting"

From Pearl Language
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Zeroth version.)
 
m (”)
Line 10: Line 10:
:*Did this design elegantly fulfill its proposed case?
:*Did this design elegantly fulfill its proposed case?
:*Would you recommend this design to a friend?
:*Would you recommend this design to a friend?
:*Is this design better than current working alternatives familiar to you?
:*Is this design better than current working alternatives familiar to you?
|therefore=Reserve time in the agenda to collect some basic feedback about the results of the last {{p|sprint}}.
|therefore=Reserve time in the agenda to collect some basic feedback about the results of the last {{p|sprint}}.
|new=Every now and then, a {{p|usability test}} gives you a ton of useful feedback in a very short time.
|new=Every now and then, a {{p|usability test}} gives you a ton of useful feedback in a very short time.

Revision as of 08:36, 21 February 2013

…in between the current and next sprint,

✣  ✣  ✣

{{{wish full}}}

Collecting useful feedback on the latest results can be as simple as taking five minutes to ask the audience to answer the following questions:

“This design is meant to sprint goal or design goal. We would like to collect your feedback on the results of this sprint. So, can you please rate on a scale of 1–5:
  • Did this design elegantly fulfill its proposed case?
  • Would you recommend this design to a friend?
  • Is this design better than current working alternatives familiar to you?”

Therefore:

{{{therefore full}}}

✣  ✣  ✣

Every now and then, a usability test gives you a ton of useful feedback in a very short time.


✣  ✣  ✣