Difference between revisions of "Tactical product owner"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Zeroth version.) |
(Business Analyst → Agile Business Analyst → Tactical Product Owner) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*Collect and process customer & user product feedback | *Collect and process customer & user product feedback | ||
*Optimize feature set within set pricing constraints | *Optimize feature set within set pricing constraints | ||
Current [[business analyst]]s can evolve into {{p|agile business analyst}}s and become excellent candidates for {{p|tactical product owner}}s. | |||
|therefore=Split the single {{p|product owner}} into a {{p|strategic product owner}} and {{p|tactical product owner}}. For successful {{p|collaborative product discovery}} distinguish between but do not separate these mutually reinforcing roles. | |therefore=Split the single {{p|product owner}} into a {{p|strategic product owner}} and {{p|tactical product owner}}. For successful {{p|collaborative product discovery}} distinguish between but do not separate these mutually reinforcing roles. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 17:04, 19 September 2012
…collaborative product discovery of a large product or product portfolio in a complex and layered organization.
✣ ✣ ✣
{{{wish full}}}
Arlen Bankston explains: tactical product owners focus on productive product creation:
- One per team
- Write or lead development of detailed User Stories
- Lead analysis and refinement activities to get user stories ready to build
- Make development team- and sprint-level prioritization decisions
- Focus on product backlog and sprint planning meeting (for scrum teams)
- Realize the product, including operational rollout and documentation
- Address market opportunities
- Collect and process customer & user product feedback
- Optimize feature set within set pricing constraints
Current business analysts can evolve into agile business analysts and become excellent candidates for tactical product owners.
Therefore:
{{{therefore full}}}
✣ ✣ ✣
✣ ✣ ✣
[[wish::The work is simply too much for a single product owner. Finding or training a good product owner is hard and expensive.|]]