Difference between revisions of "Are in"

From Pearl Language
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(+= *{{p|nemawashi}})
(+= Also see {{p|delegation poker}} and {{p|delegation board}}.)
 
Line 14: Line 14:
*'''N'''eed to be involved because they are affected by the outcome and can speak to the consequences.
*'''N'''eed to be involved because they are affected by the outcome and can speak to the consequences.
|therefore full=Include the right mix of authority, resources, expertise, information and those affected.
|therefore full=Include the right mix of authority, resources, expertise, information and those affected.
|new=Also see {{p|delegation poker}} and {{p|delegation board}}.
}}
}}
==How to use==
==How to use==

Latest revision as of 11:26, 8 March 2016

…you are getting the whole system in the room.

✣  ✣  ✣

Integrative decision-making, representing all stakes.

Make sure the right and diverse mix of people who “ARE IN” the room:

  • Authority to act, like decision-making responsibility.
  • Resources, such as contacts, time or money.
  • Expertise in the issues to be considered.
  • Information about the topic no one else has.
  • Need to be involved because they are affected by the outcome and can speak to the consequences.

Therefore:

Include the right mix of authority, resources, expertise, information and those affected.

✣  ✣  ✣

Also see delegation poker and delegation board.


✣  ✣  ✣

How to use

  • Create a simple table with are in as column headings.
  • List the stakeholders that come to mind, one per row.
  • Walk through all cells (per stakeholder) and check the cell when applicable.
  • Check the total table for completeness, consistency, and coherence.
  • Fix any omissions and maybe prune some duplicates.

Related

Sources