Difference between revisions of "Product review meeting"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Zeroth version.) |
m (”) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:*Did this design elegantly fulfill its proposed case? | :*Did this design elegantly fulfill its proposed case? | ||
:*Would you recommend this design to a friend? | :*Would you recommend this design to a friend? | ||
:*Is this design better than current working alternatives familiar to you? | :*Is this design better than current working alternatives familiar to you?” | ||
|therefore=Reserve time in the agenda to collect some basic feedback about the results of the last {{p|sprint}}. | |therefore=Reserve time in the agenda to collect some basic feedback about the results of the last {{p|sprint}}. | ||
|new=Every now and then, a {{p|usability test}} gives you a ton of useful feedback in a very short time. | |new=Every now and then, a {{p|usability test}} gives you a ton of useful feedback in a very short time. | ||
Revision as of 08:36, 21 February 2013
…in between the current and next sprint,
✣ ✣ ✣
{{{wish full}}}
Collecting useful feedback on the latest results can be as simple as taking five minutes to ask the audience to answer the following questions:
- “This design is meant to sprint goal or design goal. We would like to collect your feedback on the results of this sprint. So, can you please rate on a scale of 1–5:
- Did this design elegantly fulfill its proposed case?
- Would you recommend this design to a friend?
- Is this design better than current working alternatives familiar to you?”
Therefore:
{{{therefore full}}}
✣ ✣ ✣
Every now and then, a usability test gives you a ton of useful feedback in a very short time.
✣ ✣ ✣