Difference between revisions of "Story splitter"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(+= Small is beautiful quantified in Planguage.) |
(→Sources: += xProgramming » Ron Jeffries » Getting Small Stories) |
||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
|person=Savita Pahuja | |person=Savita Pahuja | ||
|title=Empirical Measurement of Cycle Time by Slicing Heuristic | |title=Empirical Measurement of Cycle Time by Slicing Heuristic | ||
}} | |||
{{WebSourceListItem | |||
|url=http://xprogramming.com/articles/getting-small-stories/ | |||
|site=xProgramming | |||
|person=Ron Jeffries | |||
|title=Getting Small Stories | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 07:16, 8 October 2014
…umpf, a big chunk.
✣ ✣ ✣
Get a big thing done.
Therefore:
Split it into bite-sized chunks that each deliver value.
✣ ✣ ✣
✣ ✣ ✣
Because small is beautiful, there is a strong preference for small items, as they:
- enjoy shorter short cycle times;
- show more progress on the kanban board;
- take less effort to complete;
- are easier to understand;
- are easier to test and accept;
- provide a predicable and continuous flow that facilitates expectation management; and
- make “past results are a guarantee for the future” come true, just like yesterday’s weather.
To be specific, in planguage this looks like:
Small Stories | |
---|---|
Scale | Average number of days per item. |
Meter | Track the number of days per item in a control chart. |
Wish | ≤ 2 days |
Goal | ≤ 3 days |
Must | ≤ 5 days |
Now | 20 days |
Therefore |
|
Sources
- Google Docs » Henrik Kniberg, Alistair Cockburn » Elephant Carpaccio Exercise Facilitation Guide
- Alistair.Cockburn.us » Alistair Cockborn » Elephant Carpaccio exercise
- Pareltaal » Martien van Steenbergen » Verhalenhakker
- InfoQ » Savita Pahuja » Empirical Measurement of Cycle Time by Slicing Heuristic
- xProgramming » Ron Jeffries » Getting Small Stories