Difference between revisions of "Whole system in the room"

From Pearl Language
Jump to navigation Jump to search
({{p|are in}})
m (Cosmetics.)
Line 5: Line 5:
|context=you are to make an important and complex decision that affects many people across the organization.
|context=you are to make an important and complex decision that affects many people across the organization.
|wish=understand everyone’s stakes, faster decision-making, and greater personal responsibility
|wish=understand everyone’s stakes, faster decision-making, and greater personal responsibility
|so=Include all the relevant people who {{p|are in}} in each meeting.
|so=In each meeting, include all the relevant people who “ARE IN” .
|wish full=You want to understand everyone’s stakes in order to make faster decisions and evoke greater personal responsibility.
|wish full=You want to understand everyone’s stakes in order to make faster decisions and evoke greater personal responsibility.
|background=Forces:
|background=Forces:
Line 16: Line 16:
Make “systems thinking” experiential rather than conceptual.
Make “systems thinking” experiential rather than conceptual.
|therefore full=Include all the relevant people who {{p|are in}} in each meeting.
|therefore full=Include all the relevant people who {{p|are in}} in each meeting.
|new=When you can’t get the {{p|whole system in the room}}, the {{p|3 × 3 rule}} might be feasible. {{p|nemawashi}} can be another approach and lead or follow {{p|don’t just do something, stand there!}}.
|new=When you can’t get the {{p|whole system in the room}}, the {{p|3 × 3 rule}} might be feasible. {{p|nemawashi}} can be another approach and lead or follow {{p|don’t just do something, stand there!}}.
}}
}}

Revision as of 11:28, 12 March 2014

…you are to make an important and complex decision that affects many people across the organization.

✣  ✣  ✣

You want to understand everyone’s stakes in order to make faster decisions and evoke greater personal responsibility.

Forces:

  • Growing aspirations for both systemic—rather than single-problem—solutions and for greater inclusion of people in using what they know.
  • No task is too complex if the right people can be brought in on it.
  • The nature of the whole cannot be understood fully by anyone unless all participate.
  • People cannot be expected to act responsibly without understanding the impact of what they do.
  • Having a “whole system” in the room opens doors no one has walked through before.

Make “systems thinking” experiential rather than conceptual.

Therefore:

Include all the relevant people who are in in each meeting.

✣  ✣  ✣

When you can’t get the whole system in the room, the 3 × 3 rule might be feasible. nemawashi can be another approach and lead or follow don’t just do something, stand there!.


✣  ✣  ✣